Skip to main content

Thrive: Interconnectivity of Mind & Body Well-Being

Did you happen to catch “Thrive: Interconnectivity of Mind & Body Well-Being”? If not, allow me to summarize just a few of the many relevant takeaways offered by Justine Karanof of Faranof Law during her recent talk on how to manage stress and maintain your mental health amid today’s multitude of stressors.

First, Justine reminds us that, as with meditation, we don’t need to entertain a certain, strict posture with the law. She suggests we seek to find what works for us and encourages us to think about alternative ways to balance work and self-care. Working on a project outside or taking a walk during a Zoom meeting, she explains, are solutions that can easily be incorporated into the workday. 

To think more critically about self-care, Justine encourages us to consider what each of rest, nourishment, movement, connectedness, and meaning look like in our personal and professional lives. Naturally, she notes that today’s normal will look different from that of your pre-COVID normal. 

Importantly, Justine also notes the importance of trauma-informed legal practice and draws a connection between self-care and the civil rights movement, equity, and justice.   

Justine further provides a number of recommendations for self-care. I particularly enjoyed her tips on release valve breathing techniques and the creation of a mindful life map, but again, as she suggests, you should do what works for you! You can check out Justine’s balance heart mind meditation here

Fortunately, Justine points out that the practice of law is indeed changing. She notes young lawyers are entering a state of the profession in which tendencies like working incessantly and failing to care for one’s self are becoming old norms, and asserts the legal profession is slowly but surely beginning to welcome opportunities for self-care.

You can view the full presentation, offered in the memory of UHLC alum and dedicated prosecutor Gil Epstein, here. Stay well and thrive!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Amazing, but True, Deportation Story of Carlos Marcello

Earlier this week, the University of Houston Law Center was fortunate to have as its guest Professor Daniel Kanstroom of Boston College of Law. An expert in immigration law, he is the Director of the International Human Rights Program, and he both founded and directs the Boston College Immigration and Asylum Clinic. Speaking as the guest of the Houston Journal of International Law’s annual Fall Lecture Series, Professor Kanstroom discussed issues raised in his new book, Aftermath: Deportation Law and the New American Diaspora . Professor Michael Olivas introduced Professor Kanstroom to the audience, and mentioned the fascinating tale of Carlos Marcello, which Professor Kanstroom wrote about in his chapter “The Long, Complex, and Futile Deportation Saga of Carlos Marcello,” in Immigration Stories , a collection of narratives about leading immigration law cases. My interest piqued, I read and was amazed by Kanstroom’s description of one of the most interesting figures in American le

C-SPAN Video Archive Now Online

Legislative researchers and politics fans take note. C-SPAN recently completed a digitization project placing the entirety of its video collection online. The archives record all three C-SPAN networks seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day. The videos are available at no cost for historical, educational, research, and archival uses. The database includes over 160,000 hours of video recorded since 1987 and the programs are indexed by subject, speaker names, titles, affiliations, sponsors, committees, categories, formats, policy groups, keywords, and locations. The most recent, most watched, and most shared videos are highlighted on the main page. To start watching, visit the C-SPAN Video Library and use the search function at the top of the page.

Texas Subsequent History Table Ceases Publication

This week, Thomson Reuters notified subscribers that publication of the Texas Subsequent History Table will be discontinued and no further updates will be produced, due to “insufficient market interest.” Practitioners have been extracting writ (and since 1997, petition) history from the tables since their initial publication in 1917 as The Complete Texas Writs of Error Table . The tables, later published by West, have been used for nearly a century to determine how the Texas Supreme Court or Court of Criminal Appeals disposed of an appeal from an intermediate appellate court. The purpose of adding this notation to citations is to indicate the effect of the Texas Supreme Court’s action on the weight of authority of the Court of Appeals’ opinion.  For example, practitioners may prefer to use as authority a case that the Texas Supreme Court has determined is correct both in result and legal principles applied (petition refused), rather than one that simply presents no error that requires