Skip to main content

Texas Subsequent History Table Ceases Publication

By
This week, Thomson Reuters notified subscribers that publication of the Texas Subsequent History Table will be discontinued and no further updates will be produced, due to “insufficient market interest.” Practitioners have been extracting writ (and since 1997, petition) history from the tables since their initial publication in 1917 as The Complete Texas Writs of Error Table. The tables, later published by West, have been used for nearly a century to determine how the Texas Supreme Court or Court of Criminal Appeals disposed of an appeal from an intermediate appellate court. The purpose of adding this notation to citations is to indicate the effect of the Texas Supreme Court’s action on the weight of authority of the Court of Appeals’ opinion.  For example, practitioners may prefer to use as authority a case that the Texas Supreme Court has determined is correct both in result and legal principles applied (petition refused), rather than one that simply presents no error that requires reversal (petition denied).

Though the publication of the Texas Subsequent History Table is ending, petition history is still accessible in some print sources. The Table is supplemented weekly by West’s Texas Cases Advance Sheets, and in the Texas Supreme Court Journal, though neither source provides the user a cumulative table of all Texas actions with a subsequent appellate history.

Subsequent history can also be located online using Westlaw and LexisNexis’ citators. In WestlawNext, petition history may be viewed by clicking on the case’s “History” tab near the top of the page. The direct history will show the petition’s disposition along with the date. In Lexis Advance and Lexis.com, subsequent appellate history may be found by viewing the case’s Shepard’s report. Currently, Bloomberg Law does not provide this information. In addition, the weekly orders from the Texas Supreme Court (1997-present) may be located on the Texas Judicial Branch's newly updated website, www.txcourts.gov. 

For more information about the history of petition and writ review in Texas, see James Hambleton’s Notations for Subsequent Histories in Civil Cases, 65 Tex. B.J. 694 (2002). 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Amazing, but True, Deportation Story of Carlos Marcello

By
Earlier this week, the University of Houston Law Center was fortunate to have as its guest Professor Daniel Kanstroom of Boston College of Law. An expert in immigration law, he is the Director of the International Human Rights Program, and he both founded and directs the Boston College Immigration and Asylum Clinic. Speaking as the guest of the Houston Journal of International Law’s annual Fall Lecture Series, Professor Kanstroom discussed issues raised in his new book, Aftermath: Deportation Law and the New American Diaspora . Professor Michael Olivas introduced Professor Kanstroom to the audience, and mentioned the fascinating tale of Carlos Marcello, which Professor Kanstroom wrote about in his chapter “The Long, Complex, and Futile Deportation Saga of Carlos Marcello,” in Immigration Stories , a collection of narratives about leading immigration law cases. My interest piqued, I read and was amazed by Kanstroom’s description of one of the most interesting figures in American le
1 comment
Read more

Citing to Vernon's Texas Codes Annotated: Finding Accurate Publication Dates (without touching a book)

By
When citing to a current statute, both the Bluebook (rule 12.3.2) and Greenbook (rule 10.1.1) require a  practitioner to provide the publication date of the bound volume in which the cited code section appears. For example, let's cite to the codified statute section that prohibits Texans from hunting or selling bats, living or dead. Note, however, you may remove or hunt a bat that is inside or on a building occupied by people. The statute is silent as to Batman, who for his own safety, best stay in Gotham City. This section of the Texas Parks and Wildlife code is 63.101. "Protection of Bats." After checking the pocket part and finding no updates in the supplement, my citation will be: Tex. Parks & Wild. Code Ann. § 63.101 (West ___ ). When I look at the statute in my bound volume of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, I can clearly see that the volume's publication date is 2002. But, when I find the same citation on Westlaw or LexisNexis, all I can see i
4 comments
Read more