Skip to main content

Environmental Law Handbook, 24th Edition

BernanPress has recently published the Twenty-Fourth edition of Environmental Law Handbook. Edited by Thomas F.P. Sullivan, it contains seventeen chapters written by attorneys and scholars. The first chapter focuses on the basics of environmental law covering the environmental legal system, common law theories such as nuisance, trespass, negligence, and strict liability, as well as summary of different aspects of environmental law from statutes, environmental regulations, state and local laws. The second chapter covering enforcement and liability looks at federal enforcement trends, general concepts of enforcement and liability, civil enforcement and liability, citizen suits, and criminal enforcement, and mitigation and avoidance of liability. The other chapters focus on the major environmental acts, which make up the bulk of federal environmental law. The authors provide a thorough analysis of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Clear Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), Oil Pollution Act (OPA), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (DPRCA), and Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA). Underground storage tanks, pesticides, and environmental managements systems are also discussed. This is now available in the library, currently in the new titles shelf near the reference desk.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Amazing, but True, Deportation Story of Carlos Marcello

Earlier this week, the University of Houston Law Center was fortunate to have as its guest Professor Daniel Kanstroom of Boston College of Law. An expert in immigration law, he is the Director of the International Human Rights Program, and he both founded and directs the Boston College Immigration and Asylum Clinic. Speaking as the guest of the Houston Journal of International Law’s annual Fall Lecture Series, Professor Kanstroom discussed issues raised in his new book, Aftermath: Deportation Law and the New American Diaspora . Professor Michael Olivas introduced Professor Kanstroom to the audience, and mentioned the fascinating tale of Carlos Marcello, which Professor Kanstroom wrote about in his chapter “The Long, Complex, and Futile Deportation Saga of Carlos Marcello,” in Immigration Stories , a collection of narratives about leading immigration law cases. My interest piqued, I read and was amazed by Kanstroom’s description of one of the most interesting figures in American le

C-SPAN Video Archive Now Online

Legislative researchers and politics fans take note. C-SPAN recently completed a digitization project placing the entirety of its video collection online. The archives record all three C-SPAN networks seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day. The videos are available at no cost for historical, educational, research, and archival uses. The database includes over 160,000 hours of video recorded since 1987 and the programs are indexed by subject, speaker names, titles, affiliations, sponsors, committees, categories, formats, policy groups, keywords, and locations. The most recent, most watched, and most shared videos are highlighted on the main page. To start watching, visit the C-SPAN Video Library and use the search function at the top of the page.

Texas Subsequent History Table Ceases Publication

This week, Thomson Reuters notified subscribers that publication of the Texas Subsequent History Table will be discontinued and no further updates will be produced, due to “insufficient market interest.” Practitioners have been extracting writ (and since 1997, petition) history from the tables since their initial publication in 1917 as The Complete Texas Writs of Error Table . The tables, later published by West, have been used for nearly a century to determine how the Texas Supreme Court or Court of Criminal Appeals disposed of an appeal from an intermediate appellate court. The purpose of adding this notation to citations is to indicate the effect of the Texas Supreme Court’s action on the weight of authority of the Court of Appeals’ opinion.  For example, practitioners may prefer to use as authority a case that the Texas Supreme Court has determined is correct both in result and legal principles applied (petition refused), rather than one that simply presents no error that requires