Skip to main content

Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech

In the world of higher education, perhaps no issue has received more attention in recent years than that of free speech. In a new book, Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech, Princeton politics professor Keith E. Whittington presents a cogent and fiercely argued defense of free speech on university campuses.

While the topic of free speech in the United States is often associated with First Amendment law, Whittington makes clear from the beginning that he is not making a primarily legal argument. Instead, he argues that freedom of speech is fundamental to the mission of a modern university, which is to “produce and disseminate knowledge.” Toward the end of the second chapter (which contains an excellent capsule history of the tradition of free speech) he writes, “If universities seek to produce and disseminate knowledge, rather than dogma, then they must foster an environment in which no beliefs are sacred, no ideas are safe from scrutiny, no opinions are immune from criticism. A primary commitment to the pursuit of truth requires that all other commitments always be subject to question.” 

Having provided a historical context for both freedom of speech and the mission of the modern university, Whittington goes on to address such controversial issues as trigger warnings, safe spaces, disruption of classes, and the shouting down of public speakers. In every case, his arguments are carefully nuanced and sensitive to the legitimate concerns of those on the other side. In discussing safe spaces, for example, he concedes that there is a need for spaces on campus where students and faculty have “the ability to disengage from intellectual battles and seek refuge among like-minded friends and colleagues.” Political clubs, religious organizations, and other affinity groups on campus have long provided these sorts of spaces, as Whittington observes. But he argues that “such spaces for nurturing thick bonds of solidarity with like-minded fellows cannot become the orientation of the university as a whole…. The university as a whole is inclusive precisely in order to be open to the exploration of unsettling ideas.” 

Speak Freely provides an excellent introduction to the current debate surrounding free speech on campus. Even those who follow the subject closely will find considerable value in Whittington’s clear presentation of the issues and the subtlety of his argument. The book is now available on the New Books shelf at the O’Quinn Law Library.      

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Amazing, but True, Deportation Story of Carlos Marcello

Earlier this week, the University of Houston Law Center was fortunate to have as its guest Professor Daniel Kanstroom of Boston College of Law. An expert in immigration law, he is the Director of the International Human Rights Program, and he both founded and directs the Boston College Immigration and Asylum Clinic. Speaking as the guest of the Houston Journal of International Law’s annual Fall Lecture Series, Professor Kanstroom discussed issues raised in his new book, Aftermath: Deportation Law and the New American Diaspora . Professor Michael Olivas introduced Professor Kanstroom to the audience, and mentioned the fascinating tale of Carlos Marcello, which Professor Kanstroom wrote about in his chapter “The Long, Complex, and Futile Deportation Saga of Carlos Marcello,” in Immigration Stories , a collection of narratives about leading immigration law cases. My interest piqued, I read and was amazed by Kanstroom’s description of one of the most interesting figures in American le

C-SPAN Video Archive Now Online

Legislative researchers and politics fans take note. C-SPAN recently completed a digitization project placing the entirety of its video collection online. The archives record all three C-SPAN networks seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day. The videos are available at no cost for historical, educational, research, and archival uses. The database includes over 160,000 hours of video recorded since 1987 and the programs are indexed by subject, speaker names, titles, affiliations, sponsors, committees, categories, formats, policy groups, keywords, and locations. The most recent, most watched, and most shared videos are highlighted on the main page. To start watching, visit the C-SPAN Video Library and use the search function at the top of the page.

Texas Subsequent History Table Ceases Publication

This week, Thomson Reuters notified subscribers that publication of the Texas Subsequent History Table will be discontinued and no further updates will be produced, due to “insufficient market interest.” Practitioners have been extracting writ (and since 1997, petition) history from the tables since their initial publication in 1917 as The Complete Texas Writs of Error Table . The tables, later published by West, have been used for nearly a century to determine how the Texas Supreme Court or Court of Criminal Appeals disposed of an appeal from an intermediate appellate court. The purpose of adding this notation to citations is to indicate the effect of the Texas Supreme Court’s action on the weight of authority of the Court of Appeals’ opinion.  For example, practitioners may prefer to use as authority a case that the Texas Supreme Court has determined is correct both in result and legal principles applied (petition refused), rather than one that simply presents no error that requires