Skip to main content

Reproductive Rights and Justice Stories


A new volume in the Law Stories series has arrived in the O’Quinn Law Library, making a timely contribution to an especially newsworthy legal topic: reproductive rights and justice. Reproductive Rights and Justice Stories, edited by Melissa Murray, Katherine Shaw, and Reva B. Siegel brings together important cases involving the state regulation of sex, childbearing, and parenting. The twelve cases featured in the book, some famous and others unknown, range in topic from contraception and abortion to pregnancy and parenthood. The field of reproductive rights and justice is relatively new, but the book’s framework highlights the “intersecting relations of race, class, sexuality, and sex that shape the regulation of reproduction.”

Reproductive Rights and Justice Stories demonstrates a different approach to the Law Stories series, concentrating not just on individual litigants and their attorneys, but the various social institutions that play a role in how laws change and unfold. By situating the litigation histories in a larger social field, readers are shown the interplay of top-down and bottom-up forces that provoke and shape judicial decisions. The authors recognize in the introduction that the publication of this work comes at a pivotal moment as Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy retires and is replaced by Brett Kavanaugh, a change that will shape how reproductive justice is treated in our highest court. What the authors may not have anticipated are the numerous state laws passed in 2019. Alabama’s new law bans all abortion from the time a “woman [is] known to be pregnant” – with no exceptions. Five states - Georgia, Ohio, Kentucky, Mississippi, and Louisiana - have passed bills which prohibit abortion after about six weeks - before many people even realize they are pregnant. Reproductive Rights and Stories examines both the social and judicial forces and rulings that have led to these draconian laws.

The book’s contributors offer fascinating stories and new perspectives from both famous (Roe v. Wade) and largely unknown cases (Struck v. Secretary of Defense), presented in chronological order to demonstrate the ebbs and flow of social and judicial change. One chapter, discussing Harris v. McRay, by Khiara M. Bridges is especially gripping. This chapter tells the story of the 1980 decision that upheld the Hyde Amendment (a funding restriction that prohibits the use of federal Medicaid funds for abortions in most cases). Bridges elegantly weaves the stories of the poor women of color who would most bear the burdens of the amendment with the story of the Burger Court’s precedents that led lawyers challenging the Hyde Amendment to minimize the Amendment’s disproportionate impact on these women. This demonstration of attorneys shaping their argument to fit an inhospitable doctrinal landscape, and the consequences and outcomes of those choices is valuable for law students and attorneys today to consider as they make their own advocacy decisions. The struggle against the Hyde Amendment continues today and attitudes toward the amendment have become a bellwether question for Democratic candidates competing for the 2020 presidential election.

Stories like those told in the Harris v. McRay chapter highlight core truths about reproductive rights and justice in America and the inequities that may result in people of a different sex, race, or class having less than equal protection under the law. Reproductive Rights and Stories is an essential for any library, and essential reading for anyone who seeks to understand the continuing social and judicial movements that seek to govern a woman’s autonomy, body, and health.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Law School Exams: A Guide to Better Grades

It’s that time of year again. Law students across the country are poring over their class notes and supplements, putting the finishing touches on their outlines, and fueling their all-night study sessions with a combination of high-carb snacks and Java Monsters. This can mean only one thing: exam time is approaching.

If you’re looking for a brief but effective guide to improving your exam performance, the O’Quinn Law Library has the book for you. Alex Schimel’s Law School Exams: A Guide to Better Grades, now in its second edition, provides a clear and concise strategy for mastering the issue-spotting exams that determine the majority of your grade in most law school classes. Schimel finished second in his class at the University Of Miami School Of Law, where he taught a wildly popular exam workshop in his 2L and 3L years, and later returned to become Associate Director of the Academic Achievement Program. The first edition of his book was written shortly after he finished law school, …

Citing to Vernon's Texas Codes Annotated: Finding Accurate Publication Dates (without touching a book)

When citing to a current statute, both the Bluebook (rule 12.3.2) and Greenbook (rule 10.1.1) require a  practitioner to provide the publication date of the bound volume in which the cited code section appears. For example, let's cite to the codified statute section that prohibits Texans from hunting or selling bats, living or dead. Note, however, you may remove or hunt a bat that is inside or on a building occupied by people. The statute is silent as to Batman, who for his own safety, best stay in Gotham City.
This section of the Texas Parks and Wildlife code is 63.101. "Protection of Bats." After checking the pocket part and finding no updates in the supplement, my citation will be:
Tex. Parks & Wild. Code Ann. § 63.101 (West ___ ). When I look at the statute in my bound volume of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, I can clearly see that the volume's publication date is 2002. But, when I find the same citation on Westlaw or LexisNexis, all I can see is that the …