Skip to main content

Congressional Record Index Added to Congress.gov

Nota Bene has been covering the development of Congress.gov for several years, and the Library of Congress staff behind Congress.gov continues to improve the product. Last month, the Congressional Record Index was added to Congress.gov, allowing users to search by index terms for content within the Congressional Record.  The Congressional Record Index provides topical access to remarks and activities by members of Congress, individuals, organizations, and legislative business mentioned during daily proceedings.

The Congressional Record Index is not a new creation, it is produced online daily and printed monthly by the Congressional Record Index Office. The office creates both the Index (updated dailas well as the  History of Bills and Resolutions that tracks the legislative progress of every piece of legislation introduced in Congress. You can view the indexes for Congressional sessions beginning in 1983 through FDsys  Congress.gov currently hosts the index for the 104th Congress (1995) to the present, and earlier terms will be added throughout the coming year.

Congress.gov has many ways to link to remarks by specific members of Congress, and results can be quickly filtered and narrowed by searching  for the member of Congress from the Congress.gov homepage. The Congressional Record Index will be of best use for researchers interested in locating mentions of businesses and organizations that are not indexed elsewhere.

As Congress.gov continues to improve both its search power and content, Thomas,the government’s original website for legislative information, will not remain for long. The Library of Congress will announce an official retirement date for Thomas in the coming months.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Amazing, but True, Deportation Story of Carlos Marcello

Earlier this week, the University of Houston Law Center was fortunate to have as its guest Professor Daniel Kanstroom of Boston College of Law. An expert in immigration law, he is the Director of the International Human Rights Program, and he both founded and directs the Boston College Immigration and Asylum Clinic. Speaking as the guest of the Houston Journal of International Law’s annual Fall Lecture Series, Professor Kanstroom discussed issues raised in his new book, Aftermath: Deportation Law and the New American Diaspora . Professor Michael Olivas introduced Professor Kanstroom to the audience, and mentioned the fascinating tale of Carlos Marcello, which Professor Kanstroom wrote about in his chapter “The Long, Complex, and Futile Deportation Saga of Carlos Marcello,” in Immigration Stories , a collection of narratives about leading immigration law cases. My interest piqued, I read and was amazed by Kanstroom’s description of one of the most interesting figures in American le

C-SPAN Video Archive Now Online

Legislative researchers and politics fans take note. C-SPAN recently completed a digitization project placing the entirety of its video collection online. The archives record all three C-SPAN networks seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day. The videos are available at no cost for historical, educational, research, and archival uses. The database includes over 160,000 hours of video recorded since 1987 and the programs are indexed by subject, speaker names, titles, affiliations, sponsors, committees, categories, formats, policy groups, keywords, and locations. The most recent, most watched, and most shared videos are highlighted on the main page. To start watching, visit the C-SPAN Video Library and use the search function at the top of the page.

Texas Subsequent History Table Ceases Publication

This week, Thomson Reuters notified subscribers that publication of the Texas Subsequent History Table will be discontinued and no further updates will be produced, due to “insufficient market interest.” Practitioners have been extracting writ (and since 1997, petition) history from the tables since their initial publication in 1917 as The Complete Texas Writs of Error Table . The tables, later published by West, have been used for nearly a century to determine how the Texas Supreme Court or Court of Criminal Appeals disposed of an appeal from an intermediate appellate court. The purpose of adding this notation to citations is to indicate the effect of the Texas Supreme Court’s action on the weight of authority of the Court of Appeals’ opinion.  For example, practitioners may prefer to use as authority a case that the Texas Supreme Court has determined is correct both in result and legal principles applied (petition refused), rather than one that simply presents no error that requires