Skip to main content

Class Action Suit Accuses PACER of Overcharging


Courthouse News Service has reported that a recently filed class action suit accuses PACER of systematically overcharging its customers. Many of our readers will be familiar with PACER, which stands for the Public Access to Courts Electronic Records system. PACER is a government-operated, online database that provides access to federal court documents for a fee of 10 cents per page, up to a maximum of three dollars per document. The complaint, filed by Bryndon Fisher against the Administrative Office of U.S. Courts and its director James C. Duff, claims that PACER uses an erroneous formula to count the number of bytes in an HTML document, thereby inflating its page count.

“During the past two years,” the complaint claims, “Fisher accessed 184 court docket reports using PACER and was charged and paid a total of $109.40 to the AO for this access…. Over this two-year period, based on the formula contained in the PACER User Manual, Fisher should have been charged $72.40, representing an overcharge of $37.00 or approximately 51 percent.” Fisher is seeking class certification, refunds, and an injunction. The full complaint can be found here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Congressional Report on the Executive Authority to Exclude Aliens Released Days Before Immigration Ban

On January 27 President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order, Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States. Four days earlier, on January 24, the Congressional Research Service released its own report:  Executive Authority to Exclude Aliens: In Brief.
To those unfamiliar, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) is a federal legislative branch agency, housed inside the Library of Congress, charged with providing the United States Congress non-partisan advice on issues that may come before Congress, including immigration.
Included in the report are in-depth discussions on the operation of sections of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) in the context of the executive power . Discussions of sections 212(f),  214(a)(1) and 215(a)(1) report on how the sections have been used by Presidents, along with relevant case law and precedents. Most interesting is the list of executive orders excluding some groups of aliens during past presidencies; the table all…

GAO Launches Government Transition App

Want to learn more about the upcoming presidential and congressional transitions? There’s an app for that. 

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently launched its Priorities for Policy Makers app (available free of charge for iPhone or Android), which is intended to “help President-elect Donald Trump and the next Congresstackle critical challenges facing the nation, fix agency-specific problems, and scrutinize government areas with the potential for large savings,” according to Gene Dodaro, Comptroller General of the United States and head of the GAO. The app allows users to search by agency or topic, and provides brief summaries of relevant issues as well as links to more detailed GAO reports. 

You can also find GAO priority recommendations on the agency’s Presidential and Congressional Transition web pages.