Skip to main content

New Website Monitors Warrant Canaries


  Since the publication of Edward Snowden’s revelations concerning NSA surveillance, there has been a heightened interest in the use of “warrant canaries.” A warrant canary is a notice posted by an internet service provider saying that the provider has not received any government requests that it would not be allowed to divulge. If the notice is discontinued, users can reasonably infer that the provider has received such a request. The “canary” in the name comes from the use of canaries to detect toxic gas in coal mines. Examples of the kinds of requests a provider would be prohibited from divulging include orders from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court—such as those used in the NSA’s PRISM and telephony metadata collection programs—and national security letters issued by the FBI.

Because it can be difficult to keep up with warrant canaries, or even to find out which service providers use them, a coalition called Canarywatch has launched a new website that tracks warrant canaries and keeps readers up to date on the latest developments. The coalition includes the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Berkman Center for Internet and Society, NYU’s Technology Law and Policy Clinic, and the Calyx Institute. For more information on this project, and on warrant canaries generally, see the website’s FAQ page

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Law School Exams: A Guide to Better Grades

It’s that time of year again. Law students across the country are poring over their class notes and supplements, putting the finishing touches on their outlines, and fueling their all-night study sessions with a combination of high-carb snacks and Java Monsters. This can mean only one thing: exam time is approaching.

If you’re looking for a brief but effective guide to improving your exam performance, the O’Quinn Law Library has the book for you. Alex Schimel’s Law School Exams: A Guide to Better Grades, now in its second edition, provides a clear and concise strategy for mastering the issue-spotting exams that determine the majority of your grade in most law school classes. Schimel finished second in his class at the University Of Miami School Of Law, where he taught a wildly popular exam workshop in his 2L and 3L years, and later returned to become Associate Director of the Academic Achievement Program. The first edition of his book was written shortly after he finished law school, …

Citing to Vernon's Texas Codes Annotated: Finding Accurate Publication Dates (without touching a book)

When citing to a current statute, both the Bluebook (rule 12.3.2) and Greenbook (rule 10.1.1) require a  practitioner to provide the publication date of the bound volume in which the cited code section appears. For example, let's cite to the codified statute section that prohibits Texans from hunting or selling bats, living or dead. Note, however, you may remove or hunt a bat that is inside or on a building occupied by people. The statute is silent as to Batman, who for his own safety, best stay in Gotham City.
This section of the Texas Parks and Wildlife code is 63.101. "Protection of Bats." After checking the pocket part and finding no updates in the supplement, my citation will be:
Tex. Parks & Wild. Code Ann. § 63.101 (West ___ ). When I look at the statute in my bound volume of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, I can clearly see that the volume's publication date is 2002. But, when I find the same citation on Westlaw or LexisNexis, all I can see is that the …