Skip to main content

Collateral Consequences of Criminal Conviction


A recent Houston Chronicle article highlights the difficulty many with criminal convictions have with finding work.  It explains that one obstacle they face is that Texas law often prevents them from obtaining occupational licenses that would allow them to pursue over 100 different jobs such as barbers, nurses, interior designers, plumbers, and dog trainers.  According to the article, the Texas Legislature may address the issue in the upcoming legislative session, as support for reform in this area grows.  
  
However, these are not the only restrictions that people with criminal records face.  They must also navigate other “collateral consequences” of their conviction in many other areas of life such as education, housing, and voting.  As the number of collateral consequences has grown, it has become increasingly difficult to keep track of all the actual consequences of criminal conviction.  To address this problem, Congress included a provision in the Court Security Improvement Act of 2007 (Pubic Law 110-177) that instructed the National Institute of Justice to study and catalog the collateral consequences of conviction for all U.S. jurisdictions.  The National Institute of Justice contracted with the ABA Criminal Justice Section to conduct the inventory.  The ABA announced last month that it has now completed the National Inventory of the Collateral Consequences of Conviction (NICCC). 

This unique, online tool provides information about federal and state law collateral consequences broken down by topics such as employment, occupational licenses, judicial rights, government benefits, education, political and civic participation, housing, and family/domestic rights.  You can view all of the collateral consequences for a given jurisdiction or search across jurisdictions.  You can also limit your search to mandatory or discretionary consequences as well as by type of offense such as felonies, misdemeanors, controlled substances offenses, weapons offenses, and more.  To learn more about collateral consequences and this new tool, visit the NICCC website.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spying and International Law

With increasing numbers of foreign governments officially objecting to now-widely publicized U.S. espionage activities, the topic of the legality of these activities has been raised both by the target governments and by the many news organizations reporting on the issue.For those interested in better understanding this controversy by learning more about international laws concerning espionage, here are some legal resources that may be useful.

The following is a list of multinational treaties relevant to spies and espionage:
Brussels Declaration concerning the Laws and Customs of War (1874).Although never ratified by the nations that drafted it, this declaration is one of the earliest modern examples of an international attempt to codify the laws of war.Articles 19-22 address the identification and treatment of spies during wartime.These articles served mainly to distinguish active spies from soldiers and former spies, and provided no protections for spies captured in the act.The Hagu…

Citing to Vernon's Texas Codes Annotated: Finding Accurate Publication Dates (without touching a book)

When citing to a current statute, both the Bluebook (rule 12.3.2) and Greenbook (rule 10.1.1) require a  practitioner to provide the publication date of the bound volume in which the cited code section appears. For example, let's cite to the codified statute section that prohibits Texans from hunting or selling bats, living or dead. Note, however, you may remove or hunt a bat that is inside or on a building occupied by people. The statute is silent as to Batman, who for his own safety, best stay in Gotham City.
This section of the Texas Parks and Wildlife code is 63.101. "Protection of Bats." After checking the pocket part and finding no updates in the supplement, my citation will be:
Tex. Parks & Wild. Code Ann. § 63.101 (West ___ ). When I look at the statute in my bound volume of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, I can clearly see that the volume's publication date is 2002. But, when I find the same citation on Westlaw or LexisNexis, all I can see is that the …