Skip to main content

Celebrate Mandela Day


Today is Mandela Day (officially Nelson Mandela International Day), an observance designated by the United Nations to honor the legacy of the South African anti-apartheid leader. Since 2010, Mandela Day has been observed every year on July 18, Mandela’s birthday, and this is the first Mandela Day since his death in December of last year. Each year, the South African government calls on its citizens to celebrate Mandela Day by performing 67 minutes of community service, the number having been chosen in recognition of Mandela’s 67 years of social activism. This year’s service campaign is called “Operation Clean-Up for Madiba,” and is focused on picking up litter and cleaning schools and other public places. (Mandela is often affectionately referred to as Madiba, which is his Xhosa clan name.)

In addition to being a crusader for racial justice and his country’s first black president, Mandela was also a lawyer. Along with his partner, Oliver Tambo, Mandela established South Africa’s first black law firm in 1952. Ten years later, when the government charged him with inciting workers to strike and leaving the country without valid documentation, Mandela represented himself in court. In this and other trials, he used his speeches to the court to highlight the plight of black South Africans under apartheid and to promote the cause of the African National Congress.

Anyone interested in learning more about Nelson Mandela should visit the Nelson Mandela Foundation’s website at nelsonmandela.org. The Foundation’s databases and archives contain a wealth of materials related to the anti-apartheid movement and to Mandela specifically. The Mandela trial papers, hosted by the University of the Witwatersrand, will be of particular interest to lawyers and law students. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Amazing, but True, Deportation Story of Carlos Marcello

Earlier this week, the University of Houston Law Center was fortunate to have as its guest Professor Daniel Kanstroom of Boston College of Law. An expert in immigration law, he is the Director of the International Human Rights Program, and he both founded and directs the Boston College Immigration and Asylum Clinic. Speaking as the guest of the Houston Journal of International Law’s annual Fall Lecture Series, Professor Kanstroom discussed issues raised in his new book, Aftermath: Deportation Law and the New American Diaspora . Professor Michael Olivas introduced Professor Kanstroom to the audience, and mentioned the fascinating tale of Carlos Marcello, which Professor Kanstroom wrote about in his chapter “The Long, Complex, and Futile Deportation Saga of Carlos Marcello,” in Immigration Stories , a collection of narratives about leading immigration law cases. My interest piqued, I read and was amazed by Kanstroom’s description of one of the most interesting figures in American le

C-SPAN Video Archive Now Online

Legislative researchers and politics fans take note. C-SPAN recently completed a digitization project placing the entirety of its video collection online. The archives record all three C-SPAN networks seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day. The videos are available at no cost for historical, educational, research, and archival uses. The database includes over 160,000 hours of video recorded since 1987 and the programs are indexed by subject, speaker names, titles, affiliations, sponsors, committees, categories, formats, policy groups, keywords, and locations. The most recent, most watched, and most shared videos are highlighted on the main page. To start watching, visit the C-SPAN Video Library and use the search function at the top of the page.

Texas Subsequent History Table Ceases Publication

This week, Thomson Reuters notified subscribers that publication of the Texas Subsequent History Table will be discontinued and no further updates will be produced, due to “insufficient market interest.” Practitioners have been extracting writ (and since 1997, petition) history from the tables since their initial publication in 1917 as The Complete Texas Writs of Error Table . The tables, later published by West, have been used for nearly a century to determine how the Texas Supreme Court or Court of Criminal Appeals disposed of an appeal from an intermediate appellate court. The purpose of adding this notation to citations is to indicate the effect of the Texas Supreme Court’s action on the weight of authority of the Court of Appeals’ opinion.  For example, practitioners may prefer to use as authority a case that the Texas Supreme Court has determined is correct both in result and legal principles applied (petition refused), rather than one that simply presents no error that requires