Skip to main content

Coming Soon: New Multimedia Archive for the Supreme Court of Texas and Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

Oyez.org, a project of  IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, has teamed up with the Texas Tribune to launch an online archive of cases from the Supreme Court of Texas and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Coming in late summer, the resource will provide case summaries produced by the Texas Tribune along with opinions, transcript-synchronized videos of oral arguments, and information about decisions and biographies of justices. The project is being financed with support from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.

First developed in 1997, Oyez is a multimedia resource that provides free, open access to the materials of the Supeme Court of the United States including opinions, oral arguments, explanations of decisions in a format accessible to non-legal audiences. Oyez will not only be expanding to cover Texas courts, but is developing similar sites for California, New York, Illinois, and Florida.  Eventually, Oyez hopes to offer the same in-depth coverage for all state supreme courts and appeallate courts. The Texas Tribune is planning its own companion site where the same information will be available and fundraising is underway to provide Spanish translations of case summaries as well.

In the meantime, if you are looking for information about Texas Supreme Court and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals cases, visit Texas Courts Online. We look forward to updating you when the site is officially launched!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Amazing, but True, Deportation Story of Carlos Marcello

Earlier this week, the University of Houston Law Center was fortunate to have as its guest Professor Daniel Kanstroom of Boston College of Law. An expert in immigration law, he is the Director of the International Human Rights Program, and he both founded and directs the Boston College Immigration and Asylum Clinic. Speaking as the guest of the Houston Journal of International Law’s annual Fall Lecture Series, Professor Kanstroom discussed issues raised in his new book, Aftermath: Deportation Law and the New American Diaspora . Professor Michael Olivas introduced Professor Kanstroom to the audience, and mentioned the fascinating tale of Carlos Marcello, which Professor Kanstroom wrote about in his chapter “The Long, Complex, and Futile Deportation Saga of Carlos Marcello,” in Immigration Stories , a collection of narratives about leading immigration law cases. My interest piqued, I read and was amazed by Kanstroom’s description of one of the most interesting figures in American le

C-SPAN Video Archive Now Online

Legislative researchers and politics fans take note. C-SPAN recently completed a digitization project placing the entirety of its video collection online. The archives record all three C-SPAN networks seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day. The videos are available at no cost for historical, educational, research, and archival uses. The database includes over 160,000 hours of video recorded since 1987 and the programs are indexed by subject, speaker names, titles, affiliations, sponsors, committees, categories, formats, policy groups, keywords, and locations. The most recent, most watched, and most shared videos are highlighted on the main page. To start watching, visit the C-SPAN Video Library and use the search function at the top of the page.

Texas Subsequent History Table Ceases Publication

This week, Thomson Reuters notified subscribers that publication of the Texas Subsequent History Table will be discontinued and no further updates will be produced, due to “insufficient market interest.” Practitioners have been extracting writ (and since 1997, petition) history from the tables since their initial publication in 1917 as The Complete Texas Writs of Error Table . The tables, later published by West, have been used for nearly a century to determine how the Texas Supreme Court or Court of Criminal Appeals disposed of an appeal from an intermediate appellate court. The purpose of adding this notation to citations is to indicate the effect of the Texas Supreme Court’s action on the weight of authority of the Court of Appeals’ opinion.  For example, practitioners may prefer to use as authority a case that the Texas Supreme Court has determined is correct both in result and legal principles applied (petition refused), rather than one that simply presents no error that requires