Skip to main content

Really Using Google



If you are reading this you probably think you know how to search the internet using Google. You don’t. You think you do because you have used it your whole life or because you use it every day or because you have always found what you are looking for. But you don’t really know how to use Google because you have never taken the time to learn to use it correctly. You think because you plug in the right words you are searching. You’re not. Really searching requires coupling thinking with knowing how to use a search engine. If you don’t put these two things together you aren’t searching.

Daniel M. Russell knows how to search. Dr. Russell (Ph’d in computer science) works for Google studying how people use the product for searching. He also writes a blog entitled SearchReSearch in which he teaches search techniques and poses questions for his readers to solve; hard questions like posting a picture of a hillside and asking “What kind of trees are these and why did I hear a bell when I took this photo?” He then explains how to use Google to get the answer. Read a few of these posts and you will wonder if you and Dr. Russell are even using the same search tool.  

Dr. Russell recently gave a talk in San Antonio to investigative reporters and editors and he posted the slides from his presentation as a “tip sheet”.  The outline of the presentation consists of “8 key skills that expert searchers have” and then he explores those skills with examples of searches. The material is available on his blog here: http://searchresearch1.blogspot.com/2013/06/tipsheet-for-ire-2013-ire13.html .  If you are interested in really learning to use Google and how really find things on the internet then this is a great place to start.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Amazing, but True, Deportation Story of Carlos Marcello

Earlier this week, the University of Houston Law Center was fortunate to have as its guest Professor Daniel Kanstroom of Boston College of Law. An expert in immigration law, he is the Director of the International Human Rights Program, and he both founded and directs the Boston College Immigration and Asylum Clinic. Speaking as the guest of the Houston Journal of International Law’s annual Fall Lecture Series, Professor Kanstroom discussed issues raised in his new book, Aftermath: Deportation Law and the New American Diaspora . Professor Michael Olivas introduced Professor Kanstroom to the audience, and mentioned the fascinating tale of Carlos Marcello, which Professor Kanstroom wrote about in his chapter “The Long, Complex, and Futile Deportation Saga of Carlos Marcello,” in Immigration Stories , a collection of narratives about leading immigration law cases. My interest piqued, I read and was amazed by Kanstroom’s description of one of the most interesting figures in American le

C-SPAN Video Archive Now Online

Legislative researchers and politics fans take note. C-SPAN recently completed a digitization project placing the entirety of its video collection online. The archives record all three C-SPAN networks seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day. The videos are available at no cost for historical, educational, research, and archival uses. The database includes over 160,000 hours of video recorded since 1987 and the programs are indexed by subject, speaker names, titles, affiliations, sponsors, committees, categories, formats, policy groups, keywords, and locations. The most recent, most watched, and most shared videos are highlighted on the main page. To start watching, visit the C-SPAN Video Library and use the search function at the top of the page.

Texas Subsequent History Table Ceases Publication

This week, Thomson Reuters notified subscribers that publication of the Texas Subsequent History Table will be discontinued and no further updates will be produced, due to “insufficient market interest.” Practitioners have been extracting writ (and since 1997, petition) history from the tables since their initial publication in 1917 as The Complete Texas Writs of Error Table . The tables, later published by West, have been used for nearly a century to determine how the Texas Supreme Court or Court of Criminal Appeals disposed of an appeal from an intermediate appellate court. The purpose of adding this notation to citations is to indicate the effect of the Texas Supreme Court’s action on the weight of authority of the Court of Appeals’ opinion.  For example, practitioners may prefer to use as authority a case that the Texas Supreme Court has determined is correct both in result and legal principles applied (petition refused), rather than one that simply presents no error that requires