Skip to main content

Contract Law Can be Interesting!



Contract law is boring and hard--I blame Prof. Kingsfield for this—and gets a bad rap as far as the first year curriculum goes. Torts and Criminal law have great fact patterns,everyone wants to own real estate someday so there is an incentive to learn Property law, and Constitutional law has become politics by another name so everyone has an opinion. Only Civil Procedure can match Contracts for dullness (I will redeem Civ. Pro. in a different post). I am telling you now that Contract law can be interesting. You are just reading the wrong books.


 Foundation Press has published a series of books with the title [Insert Legal Subject] Stories in which law professors give the reader a little more context on famous and influential cases.  In the volume Contract Stories (KF801.A7 C66 2007), famous cases like Hadley v. Baxendale and Hamer v. Sidway are given “the rest of the story” treatment. The text of the actual opinion isn’t included, but a lot of background information on the parties and their situations are provided along with a great deal of analysis putting the case within the context of contract law all written in a very readable format. I’ve never read Contract Stories, but I have enjoyed selections from other books in the series and highly recommend them for “lawyerly leisure reading” (I just made that up).

You are probably saying to yourself, “but reading more about these cases doesn’t sound too interesting to me!”  You may be right. If that is the case then I recommend reading Professor Lawrence A. Cunningham’s book Contracts in the Real World: Stories of Popular Contracts and Why They Matter (KF801 .C862012). (Full disclosure: I performed some research for Prof. Cunningham several years ago, but nothing associated with this book).  Prof. Cunningham explores contract issues by utilizing a series of contemporary and interesting contract cases, many involving celebrities, and uses them to explain contract law issues. The concept of mitigation is explained using the case of Washington Redskin season ticket holders being sued for not renewing their tickets. The idea of mistake is illustrated by a divorce agreement adversely affected by the Madoff Ponzi scheme. Contract acceptance is illustrated by an attorney’s offer broadcast on the television show “Dateline” being accepted by a law student at South Texas College of Law (and he also re-tells the story of Carbolic Smoke Ball in a shout-out to Professor Kingsfield).  Contracts involving Paris Hilton, Vanessa Redgrave, and Jane Fonda are also used to illustrate important points of law.

Contract law can be a difficult subject to digest for even the most diligent student. However, both of these books make contract law more approachable by making cases and concepts come alive and feel more relevant by adding much needed depth and relevance.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Law School Exams: A Guide to Better Grades

It’s that time of year again. Law students across the country are poring over their class notes and supplements, putting the finishing touches on their outlines, and fueling their all-night study sessions with a combination of high-carb snacks and Java Monsters. This can mean only one thing: exam time is approaching.

If you’re looking for a brief but effective guide to improving your exam performance, the O’Quinn Law Library has the book for you. Alex Schimel’s Law School Exams: A Guide to Better Grades, now in its second edition, provides a clear and concise strategy for mastering the issue-spotting exams that determine the majority of your grade in most law school classes. Schimel finished second in his class at the University Of Miami School Of Law, where he taught a wildly popular exam workshop in his 2L and 3L years, and later returned to become Associate Director of the Academic Achievement Program. The first edition of his book was written shortly after he finished law school, …

Citing to Vernon's Texas Codes Annotated: Finding Accurate Publication Dates (without touching a book)

When citing to a current statute, both the Bluebook (rule 12.3.2) and Greenbook (rule 10.1.1) require a  practitioner to provide the publication date of the bound volume in which the cited code section appears. For example, let's cite to the codified statute section that prohibits Texans from hunting or selling bats, living or dead. Note, however, you may remove or hunt a bat that is inside or on a building occupied by people. The statute is silent as to Batman, who for his own safety, best stay in Gotham City.
This section of the Texas Parks and Wildlife code is 63.101. "Protection of Bats." After checking the pocket part and finding no updates in the supplement, my citation will be:
Tex. Parks & Wild. Code Ann. § 63.101 (West ___ ). When I look at the statute in my bound volume of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, I can clearly see that the volume's publication date is 2002. But, when I find the same citation on Westlaw or LexisNexis, all I can see is that the …