Skip to main content

Where's the (Kobe) beef?

By


My mother is 86 years old and she loves a good hamburger or a good grilled steak. Sadly, she will never know the taste of what is arguably the finest beef in the world, Kobe beef, without traveling to Japan. Regardless of what upscale restaurants say on their menus, there is no such thing as Kobe beef in the United States. It does not exist. It is illegal to import Kobe beef into the United States. The Kobe beef for sale here is not real Kobe beef; it’s beef, but it’s not the Kobe beef.

Kobe beef only comes from a particular type of cow raised under very strict conditions in the Hyogo prefecture in Japan. It has been illegal in the U.S. to import any kind of beef from Japan since 2010 due to reports of Foot-and-Mouth disease. If you have had Kobe beef in the U.S. after 2010 then you have been a victim of fraud, but a completely legal fraud that is almost unique to the United States. 


The term “Kobe beef” is trademarked and patented in Japan, and pretty much everywhere else in the world, except the United States. What?! Yes, the U.S. is not a signatory to the 1891 Treaty of Madrid which protects geographically designated food production (also known as Geographic Indications). These are food products that are connected to a geographic place Think Florida orange juice, Maine lobster, Champagne, or Parmigiano-Reggiano cheese. None of these products are “the real thing” unless they were made or harvested in a particular place. The U.S. has made an affirmative decision not to participate in the protection of the trademarks for these types of food products; thus we have “Kobe” beef raised in Texas, “Champagne” made with grapes grown in California, and “Parmigiano-Reggiano” cheese made in New York. While this benefits domestic producers it punishes foreign producers marketing the genuine article, and it also punishes domestic consumers by selling them beef, sparkling wine, and cheese that isn’t what it advertises itself to be.


The foodie consumer can still get real Champagne from the Champagne region of France and real Parmigiano-Reggiano cheese from Parma Italy, but forget about getting Kobe beef in the United States. My mother will just have to be satisfied with Beck’s Prime for now.

Labels:

Comments

  1. UnknownJune 3, 2013 at 6:45 PM

    hmm , i am curious where you get your facts from the usda is allowing limited imports of kobe beef and it is no longer illegal in fact has not been since last year at some point as near as i can tell and the ban was i think from 209 hoof outbreak ? please do post back if this information is incorrect but there are a few places willing to prove its real kobe certified and all course i dont think even a ton has been imported and prior to the ban we imported like 70 tons? a year. the american style kobe or waygu most of the restuarants refer to come from cows imported from japan and have the lineage , never had that but i have had real kobe at mori moto's in philly before the ban and while it is fantastic its not worth the price over a good black angus

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Amazing, but True, Deportation Story of Carlos Marcello

By
Earlier this week, the University of Houston Law Center was fortunate to have as its guest Professor Daniel Kanstroom of Boston College of Law. An expert in immigration law, he is the Director of the International Human Rights Program, and he both founded and directs the Boston College Immigration and Asylum Clinic. Speaking as the guest of the Houston Journal of International Law’s annual Fall Lecture Series, Professor Kanstroom discussed issues raised in his new book, Aftermath: Deportation Law and the New American Diaspora . Professor Michael Olivas introduced Professor Kanstroom to the audience, and mentioned the fascinating tale of Carlos Marcello, which Professor Kanstroom wrote about in his chapter “The Long, Complex, and Futile Deportation Saga of Carlos Marcello,” in Immigration Stories , a collection of narratives about leading immigration law cases. My interest piqued, I read and was amazed by Kanstroom’s description of one of the most interesting figures in American le...
1 comment
Read more

Lessons for Today from the Genocide Against the Tutsi in Rwanda

By Anonymous
“Man’s inhumanity to man is not only perpetrated by the vitriolic actions of those who are bad. It is also perpetrated by the vitiating inaction of those who are good.” –Martin Luther King Jr.   Last week, I had the pleasure of attending  Professor Zachary D. Kaufman ’s presentation on  Lessons for Today from the Genocide Against the Tutsi in Rwanda  hosted by the  Johannesburg Holocaust & Geno cide Ce ntre . Among the many takeaways highlighted by Professor Kaufman and drawn from  Lessons from Rwanda: Post-Genocide Law and Policy   were ten simple yet profound lessons:   Lesson #1: Hate speech is dangerous.   To illustrate the role that hate speech played in the Rwandan genocide, Professor Kaufman discussed multiple forms of  propaganda , such as Kangura, Radio Rwanda, and RTLM “hate radio.”   He concludes that we must have limits, including with respect to social media, and further asserts that social media must do a better jo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Texas Subsequent History Table Ceases Publication

By
This week, Thomson Reuters notified subscribers that publication of the Texas Subsequent History Table will be discontinued and no further updates will be produced, due to “insufficient market interest.” Practitioners have been extracting writ (and since 1997, petition) history from the tables since their initial publication in 1917 as The Complete Texas Writs of Error Table . The tables, later published by West, have been used for nearly a century to determine how the Texas Supreme Court or Court of Criminal Appeals disposed of an appeal from an intermediate appellate court. The purpose of adding this notation to citations is to indicate the effect of the Texas Supreme Court’s action on the weight of authority of the Court of Appeals’ opinion.  For example, practitioners may prefer to use as authority a case that the Texas Supreme Court has determined is correct both in result and legal principles applied (petition refused), rather than one that simply presents no error that requ...
Post a Comment
Read more