Skip to main content

Lexology



Information overload is real, but is only a problem because most people get too much information from the wrong sources. Getting information from the right sources is often half the battle. 

If you are looking for smart and informative stories on current events and trends in the business world from a legal angle then try out the web site called Lexology.  Lexology is sponsored by the Association of Corporate Counsel and it provides articles written by practicing attorneys. These articles are usually posted on law firm’s web sites as marketing tools or simply to keep clients informed. The articles available on Lexology are targeted at business lawyers and cover a variety of issues. An article may focus on a recent case decision and a discussion of the implications of the court’s ruling.  Another article may highlight a new piece of legislation or a new rule and how each will be implemented and what steps affected parties (i.e. Clients) can take to comply with the new law. Still another may simply be a news story often with an explanation from a legal viewpoint.  

The site is searchable by keyword, jurisdiction, practice area, and firm and also allows arranging results by most recent or most popular.  While the search function is helpful and Lexology places up-to-date stories on its front page; the site’s real value, and its selling point is as a subscription service.  Registration is free. Once registered you are offered a variety of practice areas you can receive updates for. Updates can also be limited by jurisdiction. Stories come by email once a day.
To prevent information overload, only get the best information available. Lexology makes good information available for free.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Amazing, but True, Deportation Story of Carlos Marcello

Earlier this week, the University of Houston Law Center was fortunate to have as its guest Professor Daniel Kanstroom of Boston College of Law. An expert in immigration law, he is the Director of the International Human Rights Program, and he both founded and directs the Boston College Immigration and Asylum Clinic. Speaking as the guest of the Houston Journal of International Law’s annual Fall Lecture Series, Professor Kanstroom discussed issues raised in his new book, Aftermath: Deportation Law and the New American Diaspora . Professor Michael Olivas introduced Professor Kanstroom to the audience, and mentioned the fascinating tale of Carlos Marcello, which Professor Kanstroom wrote about in his chapter “The Long, Complex, and Futile Deportation Saga of Carlos Marcello,” in Immigration Stories , a collection of narratives about leading immigration law cases. My interest piqued, I read and was amazed by Kanstroom’s description of one of the most interesting figures in American le

C-SPAN Video Archive Now Online

Legislative researchers and politics fans take note. C-SPAN recently completed a digitization project placing the entirety of its video collection online. The archives record all three C-SPAN networks seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day. The videos are available at no cost for historical, educational, research, and archival uses. The database includes over 160,000 hours of video recorded since 1987 and the programs are indexed by subject, speaker names, titles, affiliations, sponsors, committees, categories, formats, policy groups, keywords, and locations. The most recent, most watched, and most shared videos are highlighted on the main page. To start watching, visit the C-SPAN Video Library and use the search function at the top of the page.

Texas Subsequent History Table Ceases Publication

This week, Thomson Reuters notified subscribers that publication of the Texas Subsequent History Table will be discontinued and no further updates will be produced, due to “insufficient market interest.” Practitioners have been extracting writ (and since 1997, petition) history from the tables since their initial publication in 1917 as The Complete Texas Writs of Error Table . The tables, later published by West, have been used for nearly a century to determine how the Texas Supreme Court or Court of Criminal Appeals disposed of an appeal from an intermediate appellate court. The purpose of adding this notation to citations is to indicate the effect of the Texas Supreme Court’s action on the weight of authority of the Court of Appeals’ opinion.  For example, practitioners may prefer to use as authority a case that the Texas Supreme Court has determined is correct both in result and legal principles applied (petition refused), rather than one that simply presents no error that requires