Skip to main content

Advances in Texas Beer Law?


Though it is difficult to keep up with the over 3,000 bills filed in both the Texas House (987 bills) and Senate (2,369 bills) this legislative session, fans of craft beer and brewing should pay attention to Senate Bills 515, 516, 517, and 518. These bills propose to change Texas law governing the sale and distribution of craft beer in Texas. According to an economic impact study released by the Texas Craft Brewers Guild last year, small, independently owned craft breweries had a $608 million economic impact on the state in 2011 alone. Groups like the Texas Craft Brewers Guild are backing changes to Texas law that would allow small brewpubs and breweries to manufacture and distribute their product to consumers more direcetly. Here’s an overview of how the bills, if passed, would change the current law regulating Texas breweries and brewpubs, including Houston’s own popular Saint Arnold’s Brewing Company:

Senate Bill 515: This bill would increase the annual limit on a brewpub’s total annual production of malt liquor, beer, or ale to 12,500 barrels, from the current 5,000. The bill also limits the amount that the brewpub may self-distribute (rather than sell through a beer distributor) to 1,000 barrels per year. 

Senate Bill 516 and Senate Bill 517: These bills would amend the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code  to allow a brewer/manufacturer to produce up to 125,000 barrels (from the current 75,000) total of both beer and ale. The amount of ale that a manufacturer/brewer could self-distribute (as opposed to going through a distributor) would be limited to 40,000 barrels annually. 

Senate Bill 518: As small craft brewers are currently prohibited from making sales directly to consumers S.B. 518 would allow small brewers (who produce less than 225,000 barrels of beer annually) to devote a small amount of their annual production limit for direct sales to consumers. Sales to consumers will be dedicated for responsible, on-premise consumption and could not exceed 5,000 barrels annually. 

If you’re a Texas beer connoisseur interested in following these bills as they move through the legislature, set up bill tracking alerts through MyTLO at http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/MnuMyTLO.aspx.  Once you have set-up an account and selected the bills you want to track, you will receive an email when actions are taken on the bill. You can also view the committee hearings on these beer bills that took place earlier this week, visit the Senate Committee on Business and Commerce site at: http://www.senate.state.tx.us/75r/senate/commit/c510/c510.htm.  Then, click to view the video archives for March 12, 2013- the date the hearings took place.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Amazing, but True, Deportation Story of Carlos Marcello

Earlier this week, the University of Houston Law Center was fortunate to have as its guest Professor Daniel Kanstroom of Boston College of Law. An expert in immigration law, he is the Director of the International Human Rights Program, and he both founded and directs the Boston College Immigration and Asylum Clinic. Speaking as the guest of the Houston Journal of International Law’s annual Fall Lecture Series, Professor Kanstroom discussed issues raised in his new book, Aftermath: Deportation Law and the New American Diaspora . Professor Michael Olivas introduced Professor Kanstroom to the audience, and mentioned the fascinating tale of Carlos Marcello, which Professor Kanstroom wrote about in his chapter “The Long, Complex, and Futile Deportation Saga of Carlos Marcello,” in Immigration Stories , a collection of narratives about leading immigration law cases. My interest piqued, I read and was amazed by Kanstroom’s description of one of the most interesting figures in American le

C-SPAN Video Archive Now Online

Legislative researchers and politics fans take note. C-SPAN recently completed a digitization project placing the entirety of its video collection online. The archives record all three C-SPAN networks seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day. The videos are available at no cost for historical, educational, research, and archival uses. The database includes over 160,000 hours of video recorded since 1987 and the programs are indexed by subject, speaker names, titles, affiliations, sponsors, committees, categories, formats, policy groups, keywords, and locations. The most recent, most watched, and most shared videos are highlighted on the main page. To start watching, visit the C-SPAN Video Library and use the search function at the top of the page.

Texas Subsequent History Table Ceases Publication

This week, Thomson Reuters notified subscribers that publication of the Texas Subsequent History Table will be discontinued and no further updates will be produced, due to “insufficient market interest.” Practitioners have been extracting writ (and since 1997, petition) history from the tables since their initial publication in 1917 as The Complete Texas Writs of Error Table . The tables, later published by West, have been used for nearly a century to determine how the Texas Supreme Court or Court of Criminal Appeals disposed of an appeal from an intermediate appellate court. The purpose of adding this notation to citations is to indicate the effect of the Texas Supreme Court’s action on the weight of authority of the Court of Appeals’ opinion.  For example, practitioners may prefer to use as authority a case that the Texas Supreme Court has determined is correct both in result and legal principles applied (petition refused), rather than one that simply presents no error that requires