Skip to main content

New Word Limits for Appellate Filings in Texas

The Tex Parte Blog is reporting that the Texas Supreme Court has amended the Rules of Appellate Procedure to provide new limits to the number of words contained in appellate briefs filed in all fourteen courts of appeals as well as the Texas Supreme Court and Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. The maximum words now allowed for each document is mentioned in the article and listed in the amendments to the rules. There are exceptions noted in Rule 9.4 that do not count toward the limit such as table of contents, statement of issues presented, appendix, and statement of procedural history. Penalties for violations include requiring a party who exceeds the limits to refile the documents and further violations could warrant "prohibiting the party from filing documents of the same kind." The order is available on the Texas Supreme Court's website under "Latest News and Updates" and the changes to Rule 9.4 pertaining to these limits can be found on pages 3-5 of the PDF file.


Popular posts from this blog

Spying and International Law

With increasing numbers of foreign governments officially objecting to now-widely publicized U.S. espionage activities, the topic of the legality of these activities has been raised both by the target governments and by the many news organizations reporting on the issue.For those interested in better understanding this controversy by learning more about international laws concerning espionage, here are some legal resources that may be useful.

The following is a list of multinational treaties relevant to spies and espionage:
Brussels Declaration concerning the Laws and Customs of War (1874).Although never ratified by the nations that drafted it, this declaration is one of the earliest modern examples of an international attempt to codify the laws of war.Articles 19-22 address the identification and treatment of spies during wartime.These articles served mainly to distinguish active spies from soldiers and former spies, and provided no protections for spies captured in the act.The Hagu…

Citing to Vernon's Texas Codes Annotated: Finding Accurate Publication Dates (without touching a book)

When citing to a current statute, both the Bluebook (rule 12.3.2) and Greenbook (rule 10.1.1) require a  practitioner to provide the publication date of the bound volume in which the cited code section appears. For example, let's cite to the codified statute section that prohibits Texans from hunting or selling bats, living or dead. Note, however, you may remove or hunt a bat that is inside or on a building occupied by people. The statute is silent as to Batman, who for his own safety, best stay in Gotham City.
This section of the Texas Parks and Wildlife code is 63.101. "Protection of Bats." After checking the pocket part and finding no updates in the supplement, my citation will be:
Tex. Parks & Wild. Code Ann. § 63.101 (West ___ ). When I look at the statute in my bound volume of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, I can clearly see that the volume's publication date is 2002. But, when I find the same citation on Westlaw or LexisNexis, all I can see is that the …