Skip to main content

Regulation Tracking: Part 2: Private Sites

In Part 1 of Regulation Tracking we looked at three free federal regulation trackers sponsored by the U.S. government.  In Part 2 we will take a look at some regulations trackers sponsored by private groups and see how they stack up against the ones sponsored by the government. ( is a project of the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.   The site is tabbed across the top with tabs for “Today”, “Agencies “, “Learn”, and “Regulatory Report Card”. The “Today” tab lists rules that have their comment period closing today, rules recently opened for comment, recently published final regulations, and recently proposed “economically significant” regulations.  On previous days I noted that they also list proposed and final rules. Along the side is section for “Popular on” and “Regulations in the News.”  The front page is very helpful, boiling down important matters that appear in the Federal Register to manageable categories and providing links to the actual regulation.  What I did not see is a link to that days Federal Register if you were interested in seeing the other material that appears, but is not listed on the web site. 

The site is directed at the citizen unsophisticated in the ways of the administrative state; this is evidenced by the tab which provides an introduction to what regulations are, who makes them, how they are made, and why they are important.  All of this is very helpful, but it must also be taken with a grain of salt because this site is not without an agenda.  The site’s sponsor, the Mercatus Center bills itself as “the world’s premier university source for market-oriented ideas.”  Translated this means that the Mercatus Center has a politically libertarian bent and thus views any type of government intrusion into the market as either wrong or down right illegitimate. Their view of government regulations is obvious from their choice of “Regulations in the News.” Out of five stories presented, four are critical of government regulations. Headlines like “Federal Regulation Strangles Chemical Security” and “Regulations are chocking small business engine of growth” are pretty obvious of a right/libertarian slant. There is also a “Regulatory Report Card” tab. This tab provides regulations that have a Report Card. I have a feeling that very few regulations receive passing grades. The political slant of this site should be kept in mind when reading any of the commentary provided by the site’s sponsor. is useful as a short-cut to finding out what is going on in the world of federal regulations on a particular day, but be aware that added content may come with a particular world view.

Justia Regulations Tracker ( is part of the Justia family of web sites.  While focuses more on current awareness; Justia focuses more on searching the Federal Register. Justia allows searching back to 2005 across all agencies and allows narrowing of search by type of notice, ie Rules, Proposed Rules, Administrative Orders, Executive Orders, Notices, and Proclamations.  Justia also allows browsing by year and by individual agency. Another feature that Justia Regulations Tracker provides is the ability to set up an RSS feed allowing researchers to easily follow the Federal Register via Justia.  What I also noticed that Justia provides something that lacks; links to the “Reader Aids”. 
It is obvious that these sites fulfill two different missions. The site is excellent for finding out what happened today. Justia Regulations Tracker is better for reviewing the Federal Register past and present.  

I went back and reviewed the sites I mentioned in Part 1 of this series and I noticed how each of those sites tended to each do something  a little bit different, but together they give the researcher a complete picture of past, present, and future regulations. I think the two sites I have reviewed here fit into that picture, both add a little bit to the overall view of the Federal Register.  While it may be too much to recommend using all of these sites it wouldn’t be too much to say use to check on comments, use to see what is happening today and use to see what is happening tomorrow, and use Justia Regulation Tracker to see what happened in the past. It’s nice when the public and private sectors can work together to get things done, isn’t it?


Popular posts from this blog

Spying and International Law

With increasing numbers of foreign governments officially objecting to now-widely publicized U.S. espionage activities, the topic of the legality of these activities has been raised both by the target governments and by the many news organizations reporting on the issue.For those interested in better understanding this controversy by learning more about international laws concerning espionage, here are some legal resources that may be useful.

The following is a list of multinational treaties relevant to spies and espionage:
Brussels Declaration concerning the Laws and Customs of War (1874).Although never ratified by the nations that drafted it, this declaration is one of the earliest modern examples of an international attempt to codify the laws of war.Articles 19-22 address the identification and treatment of spies during wartime.These articles served mainly to distinguish active spies from soldiers and former spies, and provided no protections for spies captured in the act.The Hagu…

Citing to Vernon's Texas Codes Annotated: Finding Accurate Publication Dates (without touching a book)

When citing to a current statute, both the Bluebook (rule 12.3.2) and Greenbook (rule 10.1.1) require a  practitioner to provide the publication date of the bound volume in which the cited code section appears. For example, let's cite to the codified statute section that prohibits Texans from hunting or selling bats, living or dead. Note, however, you may remove or hunt a bat that is inside or on a building occupied by people. The statute is silent as to Batman, who for his own safety, best stay in Gotham City.
This section of the Texas Parks and Wildlife code is 63.101. "Protection of Bats." After checking the pocket part and finding no updates in the supplement, my citation will be:
Tex. Parks & Wild. Code Ann. § 63.101 (West ___ ). When I look at the statute in my bound volume of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, I can clearly see that the volume's publication date is 2002. But, when I find the same citation on Westlaw or LexisNexis, all I can see is that the …