Skip to main content

Citing to Vernon's Texas Codes Annotated: Finding Accurate Publication Dates (without touching a book)

When citing to a current statute, both the Bluebook (rule 12.3.2) and Greenbook (rule 10.1.1) require a  practitioner to provide the publication date of the bound volume in which the cited code section appears. For example, let's cite to the codified statute section that prohibits Texans from hunting or selling bats, living or dead. Note, however, you may remove or hunt a bat that is inside or on a building occupied by people. The statute is silent as to Batman, who for his own safety, best stay in Gotham City.

This section of the Texas Parks and Wildlife code is 63.101. "Protection of Bats." After checking the pocket part and finding no updates in the supplement, my citation will be:

Tex. Parks & Wild. Code Ann. § 63.101 (West ___ ).
When I look at the statute in my bound volume of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, I can clearly see that the volume's publication date is 2002. But, when I find the same citation on Westlaw or LexisNexis, all I can see is that the statute is current through the 2011 Texas legislative session. No mention of the volume date at all, strange, especially since the statutes in print and on Westlaw are produced by the same company.

What's an attorney to do? Happily, the Legislative Reference Library of Texas has produced a site that will allow you to find the current bound volume date, ensuring a correct citation in only a couple of clicks. On the homepage, click on the "Legislation" menu, where you'll find a link to "Statute Publication Dates." From there you'll find a list of all code volumes, the sections covered, and current publication year. Now, I can create an accurate citation, without leaving my desk, or paying a fee.

My citation will be:  Tex. Parks & Wild. Code Ann. § 63.101 (West 2002).

Note though, that this list does not include pocket part updates to the volumes. If your statute has been amended since the publication of the original volume, the correct citation will refer to the pocket part that supplements the volume. For example, section 31.108 of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, regarding the Boater Education Program, is found in the same 2002 volume. But, it was amended in 2011, so I must refer also to the most recent pocket part that has the updated version of the statute. The correct citation for this section will be:

Tex. Parks & Wild. Code Ann. § 31.108 (West 2002 & Supp. 2011). 

One way to find out if you need to take this extra step is to look at the statute's credits at the end of the code section you are looking at online. If it shows an amendment or other action the year the volume was published or after, you'll need to take a look at the pocket part before citing.

Happy citing, and Happy Memorial Day, everyone!


  1. What? No selling dead bats? And I thought, with my excellent feline hunters, I was about to get a side business going.

  2. This is very helpful! Can you tell me why you cited to West and not Vernon? Does it matter? Thanks!

  3. Your articles are very well written and

  4. Whatever you have provided for us in these posts really appreciative.local citation service


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Legal Research AI Gains Venture Capital

The legal research company Casetext has announced that it has acquired $12 million in venture capital to expand on its CARA ("Case Analysis Research Assistant") AI software, a virtual research assistant currently capable of scanning a legal brief and retrieving cases relevant to but not cited in the brief.

CARA is not alone in the world of legal AIs.  When it was created last year, it joined the ranks of AIs including ROSS, an IBM Watson-based legal research AI, DoNotPay, a website founded in 2015 to automate the preparation of parking ticket appeals, and an amateur AI judge capable of predicting European Court of Human Rights decisions with 79% accuracy.

The Congressional Report on the Executive Authority to Exclude Aliens Released Days Before Immigration Ban

On January 27 President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order, Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States. Four days earlier, on January 24, the Congressional Research Service released its own report:  Executive Authority to Exclude Aliens: In Brief.
To those unfamiliar, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) is a federal legislative branch agency, housed inside the Library of Congress, charged with providing the United States Congress non-partisan advice on issues that may come before Congress, including immigration.
Included in the report are in-depth discussions on the operation of sections of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) in the context of the executive power . Discussions of sections 212(f),  214(a)(1) and 215(a)(1) report on how the sections have been used by Presidents, along with relevant case law and precedents. Most interesting is the list of executive orders excluding some groups of aliens during past presidencies; the table all…