Skip to main content

The (New) Bluebook Is Coming! The (New) Bluebook Is Coming!

It's that time again. Every five years (give or take), a new edition of The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation is published. On June 1st, the 19th edition of The Bluebook will officially be released (although the 19th edition can be accessed electronically right now at www.legalbluebook.com). There is one change, however, that is generating quite a bit of buzz, and it's a doozy!! The new edition explicitly addresses, in Rule 18.7.3, that most-important question that has been on everyone's lips for the last several years: How to cite to a podcast!

Really? Out of all the deficiencies with The Bluebook, all the ambiguities that should've been addressed editions ago, the most pressing matter worthy of the editors' attentions is citing to podcasts?!

I don't know which is worse: That the editors took the time to create a specific rule for podcasts, or that that is the only change that people seem interested in!

Granted, most of the other changes are just remodeling: There has been some slight reorganization and consequent renumbering. For example, many of the primary law rules now have sub-rules dealing with how to cite to them in electronic media, whereas almost all of the electronic citation rules were limited to Rule 18 (and its sub-rules) in the 18th edition. Now, if you need to determine how to cite to a legislative document available electronically, instead of checking two Rules (Rules 13 and 18 in the 18th edition), you may only need to check one Rule (Rule 13 in the 19th edition).

However, it appears that there has been some "reorganization" that I fear will create confusion: Several types of documents that had been blessed with their own sub-rules in previous editions, such as federal taxation materials, securities-related documents, presidential documents, and patents, have been relegated to the ever-more cumbersome tables in the back of The Bluebook. There was a reason why special attention was paid to these types of documents in the past, but evidently, podcasts are more important and harder to cite than Treasury Regulations, presidential documents, or anything associated with patent law! For now, all the commentators have been excited about learning how to cite to podcasts, but come the beginning of the new law school year this fall, I won't be surprised to hear these same people complaining about The Bluebook's tables.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Law School Exams: A Guide to Better Grades

It’s that time of year again. Law students across the country are poring over their class notes and supplements, putting the finishing touches on their outlines, and fueling their all-night study sessions with a combination of high-carb snacks and Java Monsters. This can mean only one thing: exam time is approaching.

If you’re looking for a brief but effective guide to improving your exam performance, the O’Quinn Law Library has the book for you. Alex Schimel’s Law School Exams: A Guide to Better Grades, now in its second edition, provides a clear and concise strategy for mastering the issue-spotting exams that determine the majority of your grade in most law school classes. Schimel finished second in his class at the University Of Miami School Of Law, where he taught a wildly popular exam workshop in his 2L and 3L years, and later returned to become Associate Director of the Academic Achievement Program. The first edition of his book was written shortly after he finished law school, …

Citing to Vernon's Texas Codes Annotated: Finding Accurate Publication Dates (without touching a book)

When citing to a current statute, both the Bluebook (rule 12.3.2) and Greenbook (rule 10.1.1) require a  practitioner to provide the publication date of the bound volume in which the cited code section appears. For example, let's cite to the codified statute section that prohibits Texans from hunting or selling bats, living or dead. Note, however, you may remove or hunt a bat that is inside or on a building occupied by people. The statute is silent as to Batman, who for his own safety, best stay in Gotham City.
This section of the Texas Parks and Wildlife code is 63.101. "Protection of Bats." After checking the pocket part and finding no updates in the supplement, my citation will be:
Tex. Parks & Wild. Code Ann. § 63.101 (West ___ ). When I look at the statute in my bound volume of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, I can clearly see that the volume's publication date is 2002. But, when I find the same citation on Westlaw or LexisNexis, all I can see is that the …