Skip to main content

Finding Law Journal Articles

If you are looking for articles on a particular research topic, the law library offers access to several databases that index and provide the full-text of law journal and law review articles. Each of these databases can be accessed from the Legal Databases drop-down list located on the law library’s main page.

LegalTrac indexes approximately 875 legal periodicals and provides the full-text of articles from over 100, going as far back as 1981. If the database does not provide the full-text of an article, it will provide a citation that you can use to find the article in another database or in print.

HeinOnline contains full-text, pdf copies of articles from over 1,200 law and law-related periodicals, both U.S. and international. The content typically stretches back to the first volume of each journal and is carried forward to the most current issue allowed by the publisher.

JSTOR is an interdisciplinary archive of over 1,000 academic journals, including many related to law. It provides access to the full-text of articles back to the first volume of each journal. However, like HeinOnline, the most recently published issues of each journal may not be available.

Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (IFLP) indexes approximately 470 international and comparative law journals published worldwide, going as far back as 1985. Since the full-text of each article is not provided, use the citation to find the article in a full-text database or in print.

Social Science Research Network (SSRN) contains the abstracts of scholarly working papers and forthcoming papers as well as a full-text electronic paper collection. Coverage for a particular journal will vary, as articles are submitted by individual scholars.

If you need assistance using any of these databases, feel free to ask at the reference desk!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Amazing, but True, Deportation Story of Carlos Marcello

Earlier this week, the University of Houston Law Center was fortunate to have as its guest Professor Daniel Kanstroom of Boston College of Law. An expert in immigration law, he is the Director of the International Human Rights Program, and he both founded and directs the Boston College Immigration and Asylum Clinic. Speaking as the guest of the Houston Journal of International Law’s annual Fall Lecture Series, Professor Kanstroom discussed issues raised in his new book, Aftermath: Deportation Law and the New American Diaspora . Professor Michael Olivas introduced Professor Kanstroom to the audience, and mentioned the fascinating tale of Carlos Marcello, which Professor Kanstroom wrote about in his chapter “The Long, Complex, and Futile Deportation Saga of Carlos Marcello,” in Immigration Stories , a collection of narratives about leading immigration law cases. My interest piqued, I read and was amazed by Kanstroom’s description of one of the most interesting figures in American le

C-SPAN Video Archive Now Online

Legislative researchers and politics fans take note. C-SPAN recently completed a digitization project placing the entirety of its video collection online. The archives record all three C-SPAN networks seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day. The videos are available at no cost for historical, educational, research, and archival uses. The database includes over 160,000 hours of video recorded since 1987 and the programs are indexed by subject, speaker names, titles, affiliations, sponsors, committees, categories, formats, policy groups, keywords, and locations. The most recent, most watched, and most shared videos are highlighted on the main page. To start watching, visit the C-SPAN Video Library and use the search function at the top of the page.

Texas Subsequent History Table Ceases Publication

This week, Thomson Reuters notified subscribers that publication of the Texas Subsequent History Table will be discontinued and no further updates will be produced, due to “insufficient market interest.” Practitioners have been extracting writ (and since 1997, petition) history from the tables since their initial publication in 1917 as The Complete Texas Writs of Error Table . The tables, later published by West, have been used for nearly a century to determine how the Texas Supreme Court or Court of Criminal Appeals disposed of an appeal from an intermediate appellate court. The purpose of adding this notation to citations is to indicate the effect of the Texas Supreme Court’s action on the weight of authority of the Court of Appeals’ opinion.  For example, practitioners may prefer to use as authority a case that the Texas Supreme Court has determined is correct both in result and legal principles applied (petition refused), rather than one that simply presents no error that requires