Skip to main content

How Do Texas Homeowners Associations Work?

By


Many homes in Texas are located in subdivisions that are governed or managed by a homeowners association, or property owners association, as they are referred to in the state statutes. A property owners’ association is a designated representative of the owners of property in a subdivision (Tex. Prop. Code §204.004). The association must be a non-profit, but many are surprised to learn that no Texas state agency regulates home or property owners’ associations. Yet, disputes between homeowners and their associations are all too common. Here are some basics of how a property owner’s association in Texas functions when it comes to disputes, as outlined in the Texas Property Code.

The association has the power to: (1) adopt and amend bylaws; (2)adopt and amend budgets; (3) hire managing agents and employees; (4) regulate use, maintenance, repair, replacement, and appearance of the subdivision; (5) institute, defend, settle, or compromise litigation or administrative proceedings on matters affecting the subdivision; (6) impose and receive payments and fees for services (§204.010(a)).

Before any enforcement action takes place (suspend right to common areas; file a suit against an owner; charge owner for property damage; or levying fine for violation of restrictions, bylaws, or rules), the association must give written notice to the owner by certified mail, return receipt requested. This notice must describe the basis for the action, and inform the owner of right to cure and her right to request a hearing. (§209.006). 

For disputes that cannot be resolved through hearing or other alternative dispute resolution, the dispute can then go to court. The county attorney is authorized to sue an association as well, to enjoin or abate violations of a restriction contained or incorporated by reference in a real property subdivision. (§203.003). A court may assess civil damages for the violation of a restrictive covenant in an amount not to exceed $200 for each day of the violation.

Note that an exercise of discretionary authority by a property owners’ association concerning a restrictive covenant is presumed reasonable, and will be strictly construed. Only if the court determines by a preponderance of the evidence that the exercise of discretionary authority was “arbitrary, capricious, or discriminatory,” will the covenant not be presumed reasonable (§202.004(a)).
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Amazing, but True, Deportation Story of Carlos Marcello

By
Earlier this week, the University of Houston Law Center was fortunate to have as its guest Professor Daniel Kanstroom of Boston College of Law. An expert in immigration law, he is the Director of the International Human Rights Program, and he both founded and directs the Boston College Immigration and Asylum Clinic. Speaking as the guest of the Houston Journal of International Law’s annual Fall Lecture Series, Professor Kanstroom discussed issues raised in his new book, Aftermath: Deportation Law and the New American Diaspora . Professor Michael Olivas introduced Professor Kanstroom to the audience, and mentioned the fascinating tale of Carlos Marcello, which Professor Kanstroom wrote about in his chapter “The Long, Complex, and Futile Deportation Saga of Carlos Marcello,” in Immigration Stories , a collection of narratives about leading immigration law cases. My interest piqued, I read and was amazed by Kanstroom’s description of one of the most interesting figures in American le...
1 comment
Read more

Texas Subsequent History Table Ceases Publication

By
This week, Thomson Reuters notified subscribers that publication of the Texas Subsequent History Table will be discontinued and no further updates will be produced, due to “insufficient market interest.” Practitioners have been extracting writ (and since 1997, petition) history from the tables since their initial publication in 1917 as The Complete Texas Writs of Error Table . The tables, later published by West, have been used for nearly a century to determine how the Texas Supreme Court or Court of Criminal Appeals disposed of an appeal from an intermediate appellate court. The purpose of adding this notation to citations is to indicate the effect of the Texas Supreme Court’s action on the weight of authority of the Court of Appeals’ opinion.  For example, practitioners may prefer to use as authority a case that the Texas Supreme Court has determined is correct both in result and legal principles applied (petition refused), rather than one that simply presents no error that requ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lessons for Today from the Genocide Against the Tutsi in Rwanda

By Anonymous
“Man’s inhumanity to man is not only perpetrated by the vitriolic actions of those who are bad. It is also perpetrated by the vitiating inaction of those who are good.” –Martin Luther King Jr.   Last week, I had the pleasure of attending  Professor Zachary D. Kaufman ’s presentation on  Lessons for Today from the Genocide Against the Tutsi in Rwanda  hosted by the  Johannesburg Holocaust & Geno cide Ce ntre . Among the many takeaways highlighted by Professor Kaufman and drawn from  Lessons from Rwanda: Post-Genocide Law and Policy   were ten simple yet profound lessons:   Lesson #1: Hate speech is dangerous.   To illustrate the role that hate speech played in the Rwandan genocide, Professor Kaufman discussed multiple forms of  propaganda , such as Kangura, Radio Rwanda, and RTLM “hate radio.”   He concludes that we must have limits, including with respect to social media, and further asserts that social media must do a better jo...
Post a Comment
Read more