Yesterday Apple Inc. (Apple) filed its response to the Department of Justice (DOJ)'s demand that it decrypt an accused terrorist's iPhone. For those not following the details of this case , here is a brief summary of the legal dispute: The government's case for compelling Apple to decrypt the phone is the All Writs Act , a law that allows judges to issue writs necessary to enforce the law. This Act was interpreted by the1977 Supreme Court case US v. New York Telephone , in which the Court ruled that the All Writs Act allowed a judge to order the phone company to comply with a special kind of wiretap even though Congress had not passed a law authorizing that particular wiretap. The DOJ is invoking this argument given that the Federal government has so far declined to pursue legislation requiring companies to provide the government with backdoor access to consumer electronics. The public now has a preview of the other side of the caset: Apple's motion lays o...
The Blog of the University of Houston Law Center O'Quinn Law Library